Correlation View
Cross-correlate the data layers — AI visibility, social following, market valuation, and search interest — and flag the entities that break the pattern.
AI visibility vs. social growthAI visibility vs. valuationSocial growth vs. valuationAI visibility vs. search interest
AI visibility vs. valuation
r = 0.92 · n = 23Dashed lines mark the mean of each axis. Red points fall more than 1.5σ from the fitted trend.
Key insights
- Pearson correlation across 23 entities: 0.92 — a strong positive relationship.
- Boston Celtics sits well off the trend line — valuation ($b) $6.1B, ai mention share (%) 2.1%.
- Los Angeles Lakers sits well off the trend line — valuation ($b) $10.0B, ai mention share (%) 3.5%.
- New York Knicks sits well off the trend line — valuation ($b) $9.8B, ai mention share (%) 2.0%.
- Oklahoma City Thunder sits well off the trend line — valuation ($b) $3.0B, ai mention share (%) 0.9%.
What this means
Entities above the trend are over-represented in AI conversation relative to their market valuation — potential undervalued brand equity. High-valuation franchises below the trend carry AI invisibility risk.
Flagged outliers