…

Correlation View

Cross-correlate the data layers — AI visibility, social following, market valuation, and search interest — and flag the entities that break the pattern.

AI visibility vs. social growthAI visibility vs. valuationSocial growth vs. valuationAI visibility vs. search interest
All leaguesNFLNBAMLBNHLMLS
AllTeamsPlayers

AI visibility vs. valuation

r = 0.57 · n = 127

Dashed lines mark the mean of each axis. Red points fall more than 1.5σ from the fitted trend.

Key insights
  • Pearson correlation across 127 entities: 0.57 — a moderate positive relationship.
  • Chicago Bears sits well off the trend line — valuation ($b) $8.2B, ai mention share (%) 0.2%.
  • Dallas Cowboys sits well off the trend line — valuation ($b) $13.0B, ai mention share (%) 3.5%.
  • Denver Broncos sits well off the trend line — valuation ($b) $7.3B, ai mention share (%) 0.1%.
  • Golden State Warriors sits well off the trend line — valuation ($b) $11.0B, ai mention share (%) 3.1%.
What this means
Entities above the trend are over-represented in AI conversation relative to their market valuation — potential undervalued brand equity. High-valuation franchises below the trend carry AI invisibility risk.
Flagged outliers