Last run completed·Jul 11 · 252 mentions

Correlation View

Cross-correlate the data layers — AI visibility, social following, market valuation, and search interest — and flag the entities that break the pattern.

AI visibility vs. valuation

r = 0.96 · n = 23

Dashed lines mark the mean of each axis. Red points fall more than 1.5σ from the fitted trend.

Key insights
  • Pearson correlation across 23 entities: 0.96 — a strong positive relationship.
  • Atlanta Braves sits well off the trend line — valuation ($b) $3.0B, ai mention share (%) 0.9%.
  • Baltimore Orioles sits well off the trend line — valuation ($b) $2.2B, ai mention share (%) 0.5%.
  • Los Angeles Dodgers sits well off the trend line — valuation ($b) $6.0B, ai mention share (%) 2.4%.
  • Oakland Athletics sits well off the trend line — valuation ($b) $1.8B, ai mention share (%) 0.3%.
What this means
Entities above the trend are over-represented in AI conversation relative to their market valuation — potential undervalued brand equity. High-valuation franchises below the trend carry AI invisibility risk.