…

Correlation View

Cross-correlate the data layers — AI visibility, social following, market valuation, and search interest — and flag the entities that break the pattern.

AI visibility vs. social growthAI visibility vs. valuationSocial growth vs. valuationAI visibility vs. search interest
All leaguesNFLNBAMLBNHLMLS
AllTeamsPlayers

Social growth vs. valuation

r = 0.26 · n = 32

Dashed lines mark the mean of each axis. Red points fall more than 1.5σ from the fitted trend.

Key insights
  • Pearson correlation across 32 entities: 0.26 — a weak positive relationship.
  • Baltimore Ravens sits well off the trend line — valuation ($b) $6.8B, social growth wow (%) 0.20%.
  • Denver Broncos sits well off the trend line — valuation ($b) $7.3B, social growth wow (%) 0.19%.
  • Las Vegas Raiders sits well off the trend line — valuation ($b) $7.7B, social growth wow (%) 0.22%.
  • Los Angeles Chargers sits well off the trend line — valuation ($b) $7.5B, social growth wow (%) 0.18%.
What this means
Follower growth against valuation shows which franchises are compounding audience faster than their price implies. Cross-check outliers here against the AI visibility views.
Flagged outliers