Archived snapshot. This is the answer exactly as Bowstone recorded it for the week of Sep 19, 2026, kept unchanged. It is also the most recent week — see the current answer, which updates each week.

Tracked prompt · week of Sep 19, 2026

Which MLB franchises do AI models say are most valuable?

“Who are the five most valuable MLB franchises?”

Asked which MLB franchises are the most valuable, the four AI models Bowstone tracks named New York Yankees most often — in 4 of 4 answers for the week of Sep 19, 2026. Six franchises were named in total.

This tracks which franchises AI models name as most valuable, not their actual valuations.

Ranked by how many of Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini and Perplexity named each MLB franchise
#NameModels naming itAvg. positionBX Overall
1New York Yankees4 of 41.051.9
2Los Angeles Dodgers4 of 42.042.5
3Boston Red Sox4 of 43.024.1
4Chicago Cubs4 of 44.023.2
5San Francisco Giants3 of 45.020.3
6New York Mets1 of 45.018.6

How this was measured

Ranked by how many of the four tracked AI models named each franchise in their answer to this exact question, then by the average position each gave it. Bowstone asks this question of Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini and Perplexity every week and records every entity named. The question asks for five, so the list is short by design. This is a measure of what the models say, not an independent valuation.

Analysis

Written by Claude · from the week of Sep 19, 2026

The top four entries here are as close to a consensus as this kind of exercise can produce. All four models named the Yankees, Dodgers, Red Sox, and Cubs, and they did so in identical order — each team's average position is a clean whole number with no variance. That uniformity is unusual and suggests these franchises occupy something close to settled, uncontested territory in how AI models currently describe MLB franchise value.

The fifth slot is where the agreement breaks down. San Francisco appears in three of four models at an average position of 5.0, while New York Mets appears in only one model, also at position 5.0. The identical average positions tell an interesting but incomplete story: the Giants earned their 5.0 by being consistently placed fifth, whereas the Mets earned the same figure from a single model. That one model evidently swapped the Giants out entirely in favor of the Mets, but the other three did not mention the Mets at all.

The BX Overall scores sharpen the picture at the top. The Yankees' score of 51.9 is notably distant from the Dodgers' 42.5, despite both receiving unanimous, first-and-second placements — suggesting Bowstone's composite weights something beyond mere naming frequency and position. Below the top two, the scores compress considerably, with the Red Sox, Cubs, Giants, and Mets clustered in a much narrower band.

What the ranking cannot show is whether this consensus reflects a durable pattern in how models describe MLB or something more contingent on the week's query phrasing. The near-perfect agreement through four teams is striking, but a single model's willingness to substitute the Mets for the Giants at position five is a reminder that even well-settled rankings carry some instability at the margins.

This section is interpretation written by an AI model and reviewed before publication. The ranking, the figures and the method above it are computed from Bowstone’s stored data and are not model-written.

View the full leaderboard →Explore all tracked entities

Bowstone tracks how AI models describe sports brands. Read the methodology.

Every tracked week

Bowstone asks this question every week and keeps each answer exactly as it was.